|“The Campaign for Michigan Families, affiliated with the American Family Association (of Michigan), wants to help Holland residents depose City Council members who voted but failed to expand the anti-discrimination ordinance to include sexual orientation and gender identity. The AFAâ€™s Gary Glenn vowed to support candidates running against those who ‘tried to impose homosexual activistsâ€™ political agenda on city residents.’ The AFA also sees the gay agenda behind some lawmakersâ€™ efforts to include sexual orientation in a statewide anti-school bullying bill.”
GRAND RAPIDS PRESS
Gays not faring so well on the Lakeshore
by Charley Honey | The Grand Rapids Press
Although I have been accused, at times, of pushing the so-called â€œgay agenda,â€ I must confess I donâ€™t know what it is.
Whatever it is, the gay agenda allegedly is running loose on the Lakeshore, judging from objections to recent gay-inclusion proposals there.
The AFA also sees the gay agenda behind some lawmakersâ€™ efforts to include sexual orientation in a statewide anti-school bullying bill. Was fear of the gay agenda also a factor in the Saugatuck school boardâ€™s decision not to adopt a proposed coming-out video in its sex education unit on sexual harassment and bullying, even though gay students are more likely to suffer from that?
Not necessarily. Perhaps opponents simply agreed with board President Mike Van Loon that all bullying is wrong, whether â€œblack, white, pink, purple, short, tall.â€
Whatâ€™s certain: Gay-rights advocates have not fared well on the Lakeshore this year. Include Hope Collegeâ€™s reaffirmation not to recognize campus groups contrary to the Reformed Church in Americaâ€™s stance against gay relationships.
Religious communities are digging in on the gay issue, even as polls show more of them accepting homosexuality and gay marriage.
Pluralities of Catholics (46 percent) and white mainline Protestants (49 percent) now support gay marriage, while heavy majorities of white evangelicals (74 percent) and black Protestants (62 percent) oppose it, according to a 2010 Pew Research Center poll.
The numbers, while reflecting increasing acceptance on both personal and denominational levels, illustrate a deep persisting divide. Behind the polls, many people thoughtfully debate and discern the complexities. But the more public and polarized version pits the gay-agenda-pushers on one side against homophobes on the other.
Letâ€™s be clear about something, that versionâ€™s played out. Just because someone opposes gay marriage doesnâ€™t make her homophobic; she could be sincerely seeking to follow her faith and conscience. And just because someone favors it doesnâ€™t mean he is pushing a broader agenda; he could be sincerely seeking, too.
Itâ€™s time for less demonizing and more listening in the middle.
A well-worn pastoral maxim calls for a â€œboth-andâ€ approach to challenging issues. Donâ€™t divide the issue into a choice of either this position or that. Recognize both sides have something to offer and find ways to include both perspectives.
But the both-and option is in short supply in our either-or culture. When it comes to homosexuality, either youâ€™re for legalizing gay marriage and ordaining gay ministers or not. The Bible says this; the Bible says that â€” end of story.
Whereâ€™s the middle ground?
As one who instinctively seeks the middle ground, I find it hard to locate here. How can you include both perspectives in such a basic clash of values? For Christians, there doesnâ€™t seem much room for compromise between those who cite biblical passages condemning homosexual acts and those who see loving acceptance in the larger Scriptural story.
But there is room for protecting churchesâ€™ religious rights while ensuring gaysâ€™ civil rights. And there is room for listening even if you hold different views.
A lot of people still are working this out. Churches can provide a more inviting venue for people to listen to each otherâ€™s stories with respect and compassion.
Room for All is a Reformed Church in America group that seeks full participation of gays and lesbians in the RCA. While dismayed by the recent developments, Executive Director Marilyn Paarlberg says the group offers speakers to help congregations grapple graciously with the issue.
Itâ€™s a long-term construction project, but building beats tearing each other down. In a tearing-down culture, more churches should make building bridges their agenda.
|Homosexual activist groups know they would not win a vote
of the people in a city where 64 percent of voters supported
Michigan’s Marriage Protection Amendment. But it doesn’t
mean they’re giving up.
“A gay rights group will not attempt a ballot initiative to amend a city ordinance to include sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Holland is Ready rejects ballot move
by Annette Manwell
Holland â€” A gay rights group will not attempt a ballot initiative to amend a city ordinance to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
The decision was made at a Monday meeting of the group. It comes less than two weeks after the Holland City Council denied a request by Bill Freeman, chaplain of Interfaith Congregation, to include the language in its human relations and fair housing ordinances and the equal employment opportunity policy. The council referred Freemanâ€™s request to the cityâ€™s Human Relations Commission, which, after almost a year of study, in April recommended that the council include the terms.
A 5-4 vote on June 15 by the city council has forced groups in favor of the inclusion in other directions.
â€œThe vote was a very close one,â€ the Rev. Jennifer Adams, pastor of Grace Episcopal Church in Holland and spokeswoman for Holland is Ready, wrote in an email. â€œItâ€™s obvious that Holland, as a community, is moving in the direction of inclusion and equal rights for all.â€
â€œIâ€™m surprised by (Holland is Readyâ€™s) decision; thatâ€™s unfortunate,â€ said city Councilman Brian Burch, who voted against adding the language. He said before the council vote that he was in favor of a ballot initiative.
Holland is Ready â€œwill take the approach of furthering conversation, education and creative initiatives with businesses, local government and organizations who are also working toward enhancing diversity and inclusion,â€ wrote Adams.
â€œThatâ€™s great, thereâ€™s opportunity in that,â€ was Burchâ€™s response, adding it is necessary to â€œbuild understanding for equal and individual rights.â€
Until Love is Equal, another group working for equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in Holland, was more divided after the Holland is Ready meeting Monday, said Drew Stoppels, lead spokesman for Until Love is Equal.
Many members of Until Love is Equal attended the meeting, he said, and remain in favor of asking Holland voters to include the language. Stoppels, however, is not, saying there is not adequate time before the election to leap all the legal hurdles.
Activists would need to draft petition and ballot language, have it approved by the cityâ€™s election commission and obtain 1,310 signatures in the next few weeks in order for the issue to be on the November ballot.
Until Love is Equalâ€™s Facebook page has grown to 2,300 fans. The group is planning two radio shows and has launched a website since it formed, the day after the council vote.
Freeman said Tuesday, he is undecided and has concerns about asking the majority for rights of a minority. He plans to make a final decision after meeting with Mayor Kurt Dykstra later this week.
â€œI am taking some time to discern whatâ€™s the best course of action,â€ Freeman said.
Whatever the next step, it presents an opportunity, Adams said.
â€œWhile we were disappointed with the (June 15) vote, the actual process revealed significant momentum toward establishing equality and fairness for all,â€ she wrote. â€œAs Holland is Ready, we plan to continue to help reveal the vibrant, diverse, welcoming community weâ€™re being given the opportunity to be.â€
â€œI think thereâ€™s a spirit of inclusion in Holland,â€ Burch said. â€œWe do have an amazingly diverse community. We have a lot going for us.â€
|“The Holland City Council defeated a proposal that would add sexual orientation to the city’s civil rights policy. …Since then, Michigan anti-gay rights crusader Gary Glenn has called the proposal ‘dangerous.’ Glenn is the president of the American Family Association and (chairman of) the Campaign for Michigan Families. He tells WZZM 13 News that (CMF) will financially help support candidates who run against any of the three council members who voted yes for the failed proposal and are involved in the city’s upcoming election.”
WZZM-TV CHANNEL 13
Attacks follow Holland’s gay rights no vote
by Steve Patterson and Jessica Puchala
HOLLAND, Mich. — Holland City Council members who voted in favor of amending an ordinance to protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation are now facing an organized effort to remove them from office.
The Holland City Council defeated a proposal that would add sexual orientation to the city’s civil rights policy.
The proposed amendment was brought to the city council to protect gay citizens against discrimination. The proposal was defeated in a 5-to-4 split decision.
Since then, Michigan anti-gay rights crusader Gary Glenn has called the proposal “dangerous.”
Glenn is the President of the American Family Association and The Campaign for Michigan Families. He tells WZZM 13 News that his organization will financially help support candidates who run against any of the three council members who voted yes for the failed proposal and are involved in the city’s upcoming election.
“I think we need to lose this image that we are a little too conservative an unwelcoming,” said 2nd Ward Commissioner Jay Peters. “These kinds of things from the American Family Association only try to keep that going.”
Peters is one of the council members who voted yes and is the only among three members running for re-election who is challenged by opponents. The deadline to file was May 10. Any other challengers will have to write in. Glenn promises support.
“There’s got to be a place where Mr. Glenn has got to focus his interest and try to do some good somewhere else,” said Peters.
Meanwhile, a movement on Facebook to boycott Holland business is growing. A group called “I’m Boycotting Holland Until Love is =” now has close to 500 members.
“It’s a knee-jerk reaction,” said Business Owner Bob Schulze.
Schulze owns Globe Vision in downtown, Holland. He calls the movement shortsighted and ironic, saying that he and many area business owners supported the measure.
“I’m not that upset and I’m really not that nervous,” he said. “I think they will see that they probably don’t want to hurt the businesses that are for the issue.”
|“A (bullying) bill calling itself ‘Mattâ€™s Safe School Law’ awaits a vote in the Senate. It requires public school districts to adopt anti-bullying policies and submit them to the state. … It does not include language, as does another proposed bill, that specifies a studentâ€™s real or perceived race, religion and sexual orientation in its definition of bullying. The American Family Association (of Michigan) has objected to that language as ‘a Trojan horse for homosexual activistsâ€™ political agenda.’â€
GRAND RAPIDS PRESS
Michigan anti-bullying legislation advocates
by Charley Honey
Those concerned about bullying agree schools need policies to discourage it. What they canâ€™t agree on is what those policies should say.
State legislation requiring public schools to have such policies has yet to be adopted in Lansing after 10 years of pushing by advocates. The State Board of Education in 2001 asked districts to adopt policies and issued a model policy in 2006. Michigan is one of only five states without such laws, Gov. Rick Snyder pointed out in urging passage of a bill.
â€œOne of the reasons this billâ€™s been stalled for so long is we have adults saying â€˜This is what we want,â€™ not â€˜This is what our kids need,â€™â€ said Kevin Epling, co-director of Bully Police USA, whose son, Matt, committed suicide in 2002.
A bill calling itself â€œMattâ€™s Safe School Lawâ€ awaits a vote in the Senate. It requires public school districts to adopt anti-bullying policies and submit them to the state. It does not apply to private schools.
Epling calls it a â€œmuch reduced versionâ€ of the originally proposed Mattâ€™s law and hopes it is strengthened. It does not include language, as does another proposed bill, that specifies a studentâ€™s real or perceived race, religion and sexual orientation in its definition of bullying.
The American Family Association has objected to that language as â€œa Trojan horse for homosexual activistsâ€™ political agenda.â€
â€œI think a child shouldnâ€™t be bullied, whether they be gay or obese or have red hair,â€ said Jones, whose district includes Barry and Allegan counties. â€œIf we start having enumerations in there, we could be back every six months putting in a new classification.â€
Religious schools keep pace
Local Christian and Catholic schools have their own policies but are keeping an eye on the state legislation.
â€œOur Student Dignity Policy has been adequate for us in the past, but with a new policy coming from the state, we should
The Catholic secondary schoolsâ€™ policy prohibits sexual and racial harassment, including threats, name-calling and posting â€œharmful information on the Internet.â€
â€œThe Gospel doesnâ€™t just call us to tolerance of one another, it calls us to love one another,â€ Faber said. â€œThatâ€™s what weâ€™re bringing to students.â€
The Grand Rapids Christian Schools board Monday is slated to approve revisions to its policy on bullying. The policy includes consequences but also ways to reconcile those who bully back into the school community, Superintendent Tom DeJonge said.
â€œWe talk about how students are to be treated in love, whether theyâ€™re the guilty party or not,â€ DeJonge said, â€œand that, in Christ, we provide supports and resources for those that have been harmed as well as those doing the harming.
â€œIt doesnâ€™t mean thereâ€™s not punishment, but itâ€™s also about rebuilding a community thatâ€™s been broken.â€
|GRAND RAPIDS PRESS
Grand Rapids, Michigan
June 19, 2011
Anti-gay rights activist Gary Glenn poo-
After Holland City Council refused to add sexual orientation to the cityâ€™s anti-discrimination ordinances by a 5-4 vote last week, some suggested the question be put to Holland residents. Anti-gay rights activist Gary Glenn, president of the American Family Association of Michigan, said such a ballot issue would fare no better than same-sex marriage did in Holland during a 2004 statewide referendum.
â€œIt will be soundly rejected … in a community that voted 64 percent in favor of the Marriage Protection Amendment,â€ Glenn said.
|â€œ’Given the serious threat these discriminatory gay rights ordinances have proven to pose to religious freedom in other communities, pro-family residents of Holland can’t afford the risk that a single council member might be replaced or pressured to change his vote and allow such a dangerous policy to become law,’ (Campaign for Michigan Families chairman Gary) Glenn said in a prepared statement. ‘To prevent that, our PAC will financially and otherwise assist candidates who file to run against the three council members this fall who tried to impose homosexual activists’ political agenda on city residents.’
Supporters of expanding the ordinance are planning to launch a petition drive to get the proposal on the ballot, but Glenn predicted any such proposal would fail, given that 64 percent of city voters voted in favor of the Marriage Protection Amendment when it was on the 2004 ballot. ‘Holland voters are not going to endorse a homosexual agenda,’ he said.”
GRAND RAPIDS PRESS
‘Pro-family’ group aims to unseat Holland council
by Greg Chandler / The Grand Rapids Press
HOLLAND, Mich. â€“ A statewide “pro-family” political action committee wants to target three Holland City Council members who voted in favor of expanding the city’s anti-discrimination ordinance to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
The Campaign for Michigan Families, which is affiliated with the Michigan chapter of the American Family Association, hopes to support candidates to run against Mayor Pro Tem Bob Vande Vusse and Councilmen Jay Peters and David Hoekstra in re-election bids this fall.
The three were part of the minority in the councilâ€™s 5-4 vote Wednesday night that rejected expanding the anti-discrimination ordinance.
But Peters, who has been on the council since 2007, is the only candidate of the three currently facing a re-election challenge. He faces an August primary race that includes former Councilman Victor Oroczo and Planning Commissioner Jerry Tonini.
Vande Vusse and Hoekstra did not have any opponents file to run against them by the May 10 filing deadline. Any potential opponents would have to run as write-in candidates.
â€œItâ€™s their right,â€ Vande Vusse said of the ouster effort. â€œI will stand on my record of 20 years (that Iâ€™ve been on the council). I trust the judgment of the people of Holland and the people of the Fourth Ward who have given me the opportunity to represent them for the past 20 years.â€
The lack of challengers isn’t deterring campaign chairman Gary Glenn, who urged “pro-family” candidates to consider running against the three incumbents, saying it would offer funding support.
“To prevent that, our PAC will financially and otherwise assist candidates who file to run against the three council members this fall who tried to impose homosexual activists’ political agenda on city residents.”
The proposed ordinance change had included a provision exempting religious organizations, their educational programs, and institutions that address housing, employment, education and other services. That didnâ€™t keep many opponents from stating their opposition on moral grounds. Glenn, however, says that provision was narrowly written and that the ordinance would prevent â€œindividual citizens from exercising their religious freedom.â€
Hoekstra has been a council member since 2003. Neither Peters nor Hoekstra could be reached for comment Saturday.
The fourth council member who voted in favor of expanding the ordinance, At-large Councilman Shawn Miller, is not running for election to the seat he was appointed to last month.
Supporters of expanding the ordinance are planning to launch a petition drive to get the proposal on the ballot, but Glenn predicted any such proposal would fail, given that 64 percent of city voters voted in favor of the Marriage Protection Amendment when it was on the 2004 ballot.
“Holland voters are not going to endorse a homosexual agenda,â€ he said.
The announcement of the statewide campaign comes a day after a group supporting expanding the anti-discrimination ordinance launched a Facebook page calling for a boycott of the city in protest of the council vote. As of Saturday afternoon, that group had close to 240 members.
|(The Holland ‘gay rights’ ordinance) was defeated by only one vote, a margin that Campaign For Michigan Families Chairman Gary Glenn said was ‘too close for comfort.’ He is targeting Holland City Council members David Hoekstra, Jay Peters and Robert Vande Vusse. He accused them of trying to ‘impose homosexual activists’ political agenda on (Holland) city residents.’ Glenn also said that gay rights ordinances are a threat to the religious freedom. ‘To prevent that, our PAC will financially…assist candidates who file to run against these three city council members,’ he said in a statement released Friday.”
Pro-Family Group Gets Into Holland Gay Rights Fight
Campaign For Michigan Families Chairman Gary Glenn says this week’s
by Rod Kackley, Paul Cicchini
A statewide political action committee that backs candidates who support “traditional family values” is urging pro-family supporters in Holland to run against the three city council members, facing re-election in November, who voted in favor of a gay rights ordinance.
That proposal was defeated by only one vote, a margin that Campaign For Michigan Families Chairman Gary Glenn said was “too close for comfort.”
He is targeting Holland City Council members David Hoekstra, Jay Peters and Robert Vande Vusse. He accused them of trying to “impose a homosexual activists’ political agenda on (Holland) city residents.”
Glenn also said that gay rights ordinances are a threat to the religious freedom.
“To prevent that, our PAC will financially…assist candidates who file to run against these three city council members,” he said in a statement released Friday.
Dave Hoekstra, Holland’s 6th Ward Councilman, Â told WOOD Radio he didn’t even know Glenn was coming after him, again.
Hoekstra says about a year ago, the two men exhanged e-mails.
“In which he pretty clearly indicated that if I didn’t vote in a particular way that I might face some political consequences,” said Hoekstra.
Hoekstra says his main concern was enhancing Holland as a welcoming community. He says any steps that have been achieved in realizing civil liberties and justice haven’t come easily.
“And we keep talking about, and we make statements about the fact that we as a people value justice and we just have to make sure that our walk is matching our talk,” said Hoekstra.
|“Even though the Holland City Council voted against a human rights resolution Wednesday, the issue could find its way to the November ballot. The details have not been worked out, but petitions are likely to be circulated looking for support of adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the city of Hollandâ€™s Human Relations and Fair Housing ordinances and equal employment opportunity policy. ‘I think we have to go for a referendum,’ said Bill Freeman, chaplain of Interfaith Congregation, who brought the issue to the Holland City Council more than a year ago. A split council shot down the request Wednesday 5-4 after more than four hours of comments from the public and many prepared statements from council members.”
Human rights resolution denied,
By Annette Manwell
Holland, MI â€” Even though the Holland City Council voted against a human rights resolution Wednesday, the issue could find its way to the November ballot.
The details have not been worked out, but petitions are likely to be circulated looking for support of adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the city of Hollandâ€™s Human Relations and Fair Housing ordinances and equal employment opportunity policy.
â€œI think we have to go for a referendum,â€ said Bill Freeman, chaplain of Interfaith Congregation, who brought the issue to the Holland City Council more than a year ago.
A split council shot down the request Wednesday 5-4 after more than four hours of comments from the public and many prepared statements from council members. It was nearly midnight when the decision was made, but people passionate about the issue endured to hear the vote.
What was on the table Wednesday was only a resolution asking city attorneys to add sexual orientation and gender identity to the cityâ€™s human rights ordinances and policies, on which the council would then have to vote.
â€œThe ballot measure was councilâ€™s idea,â€ said the Rev. Jennifer Adams from Grace Episcopal Church in Holland and a member of Holland is Ready, adding, â€œI think it would have a good shot.â€
â€œItâ€™s unfortunate,â€ Freeman said. â€œI donâ€™t think you should ask the majority for the rights of the minority.â€
Members of Holland is Ready, a group of concerned people working for rights of gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people, are absorbing the council decision and have not considered what to do next, Adams said.
The mood outside council chambers after the meeting was disappointment and â€œsurprised by the experience,â€ considering most of the comments to council were in favor of the resolution, she said.
â€œWe were all just shocked that they didnâ€™t let the process go through,â€ Freeman said of the mood after the vote. â€œTo let it go through would have shown some respect to the Human Relations Commission that spent months studying the issues.â€
Approving the resolution was not approving the ordinance amendment, he said.
â€œItâ€™s not over, because the issues is not going away, the people arenâ€™t going away,â€ Adams said.
The resolution brought attention from around the world. Council members said they received emails and letters from people in other countries as well as around the state and nation.
People who spoke Wednesday suggested Holland had the opportunity to make a strong statement about human rights. Freeman agreed, saying the vote would have been noticed around the country and a unanimous vote would have had â€œgreat impact.â€
â€œI think Holland is better than the 5-4 vote,â€ he said.
Decisions made by a local government do have an effect, Adams said. â€œThatâ€™s why there is local government. Itâ€™s a critical dimension of long-term change.
â€œI think our council missed an opportunity.â€
Supporters face many steps
Launching a ballot initiative to add sexual orientation and gender identity to the cityâ€™s human rights ordinances is not a simple task.
First, proponents need to draft a proposed ordinance as well as specific language for the petition, Holland City Attorney Andy Mulder said. The city attorneyâ€™s office must decide whether the language fits required forms.
After language is approved, proponents need 1,310 signatures â€” 15 percent of Hollandâ€™s voter turnout in the last gubernatorial election.
The city clerkâ€™s office would have 10 days to verify all the signatures.
Then, the city council would have 30 days to either adopt the proposed ordinance or put it on the ballot. (By the way, the city council isnâ€™t allowed to initiate a ballot initiative.)
If all that is completed and submitted to the county before Aug. 16, the initiative can be on the Nov. 8 ballot.
Finally, if voters approve the ballot initiative, the city council cannot change it in any way for two years.
|“The action drew the praise of the anti-gay American Family Association of Michigan. Gary Glenn, president of the group, had this to say in a press release: ‘Mayor Dykstra and the city council were right to have the courage to reject demands by homosexual activists and their allies for this discriminatory ordinance,’ Glenn said.”
Holland, Mich. city council rejects legislation prohibiting
by Todd A. Heywood
HOLLAND, Mich. — The Holland City Council has rejected legislation which would have prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity and expression.
WWMT reports the meeting went until nearly midnight, and resulted in a 5 to 4 vote. Nearly 200 people packed the cityâ€™s council chambers to express their opinions on the legislation.
Holland has come under continuing pressure on this issue over the last couple of years. Oscar winning screenwriter Dustin Lance Black was in the area shooting a film, and was invited to the campus of Hope College, a private higher education institution.
However, the invitation was rescinded when Black was told he could not talk about gay rights. This move led Black and others to create an outside event to discuss LGBT issues in the conservative town. It also led to the formation of a group of Hope graduates who lobbied the college to change its policies on homosexuality, which the college has declined to do.
Black won the Oscar for his screenplay Milk, which told the story of gay icon Harvey Milk. Milk, along with San Francisco Mayor George Mascone, were murdered by former supervisor Dan White. Milk was widely recognized as the first openly gay person to hold a political position in a large city in the United States.
The action drew the praise of the anti-gay American Family Association of Michigan. Gary Glenn, president of the group, had this to say in a press release:
â€œMayor Dykstra and the city council were right to have the courage to reject demands by homosexual activists and their allies for this discriminatory ordinance,â€ Glenn said. â€œIn other cities and states, these so-called â€˜sexual orientationâ€™ laws have proven to themselves be discriminatory, being used to discriminate against and punish individual Christians, strip churches of their tax-exempt status, punish Christian business owners, and discriminate against and violate the civil rights and religious freedom of cherished community groups such as the Boy Scouts, Salvation Army, and Catholic Charities who refuse to endanger children by endorsing homosexual activistsâ€™ political agenda.â€
|“Those opposed cited religious reasons, the concern that the ordinance will take away rights of property and business owners, that homosexuality is immoral or that it is not a protected class and maintained that homosexuality is a choice, not a trait a person is born with like being black, Hispanic or a woman.”
Sexual orientation equal rights amendment
By ANNETTE MANWELL
Holland, MI â€” â€œThe motion fails, five to four.â€
The statement by Hollandâ€™s Acting Deputy City Clerk Anna Perales was followed by sighs and groans of people in the crowded chambers of the Holland City Council. A recommendation from the cityâ€™s Human Relations Commission to include sexual orientation and gender identity in the cityâ€™s human rights ordinances failed to gain the support needed to become an amendment.
After hours of resident and council comments, the vote was 5-4. No votes came from Mayor Kurt Dykstra, Todd Whiteman, Nancy De Boer, Myron Trethewey, and Brian Burch. Yes votes came from Jay Peters, Dave Hoekstra, Shawn Miller and Bob VandeVusse.
Many members of council spoke from prepared statements. Burch and Trethewey were adamant that a vote from nine people was not going to change the attitudes and opinions of the people living in the city and that a vote of the people would make a stronger statement.
Some who spoke during the public comment portion of Wednesdayâ€™s city council meeting suggested that the council would be making a strong statement of acceptance if it passed the resolution.
In the time heâ€™s been council he has not been asked to enact a law in order to â€œmake a statement,â€ Dykstra said.
Bill Freeman, chaplain of Interfaith Congregation, who first asked for the inclusion of the statements more than a year ago, said he would start a drive to get the issue on the ballot.
For more than two and a half hours people opposed and supportive of adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the city of Hollandâ€™s civil rights ordinances and policies spoke to the City Council.
Some were teary-eyed. Some spoke louder than others. Many all but begged the city council to stop the flight of young people from the city.
Family members of people who are gay told the council that their loved ones left because Holland is not a welcoming community.
â€œHolland is not an accepting community,â€ said Holland resident Greg Lamb. â€œItâ€™s not a progressive community.â€
Lamb said his daughter came home from a walk in Centennial Park one day after someone from a car driving down River Avenue called her â€œdyke.â€ She left because sheâ€™s not accepted here, he said.
Several people said itâ€™s not the fact that a family member is gay that has torn their family apart â€” itâ€™s the fact that loved one left because Holland is not accepting.
â€œNow Iâ€™m lucky if I see (my sister) a few times a year,â€ Jamie Coon, of Hamilton said.
â€œItâ€™s not like passing this thing is going to increase the percentage of gay people in Holland,â€ Lamb said.
Only a few people spoke up and said, â€œI am gay.â€ But many people said “my son,” “my daughter,” “my friends,” “my brother” or “my sister is gay.”
Still others tried to reason with the council on economics and said property values will go up if people feel welcome in the community and choose to stay and live and spend money in the city.
Those opposed cited religious reasons, the concern that the ordinance will take away rights of property and business owners, that homosexuality is immoral or that it is not a protected class and maintained that homosexuality is a choice, not a trait a person is born with like being black, Hispanic or a woman.
Barbara Laman Coon countered the argument of landlords losing rights with â€œI donâ€™t think that discrimination should be anyoneâ€™s right.â€